Bankruptcy Exemptions

Written by Craig D. Robins, Esq.

For the very first time in the 15 years that I have been writing articles on bankruptcy law, I found it necessary to pull the article that I had just submitted because of some major late-breaking news that will immediately affect all consumer bankruptcy practitioners.

The New Exemption is $50,000. On September 6, 2005, Governor George Pataki signed into law an amendment to the existing New York homestead exemption statute boosting the homestead exemption from $10,000 to $50,000. This new law came as a total surprise to the bankruptcy bar with virtually no warning of any kind. This change will have a far-reaching impact on local bankruptcy practice, especially over the next five weeks, at which time the federal bankruptcy laws will drastically change on October 17, 2005. The new exemption will be an incredible boon for many home owners who previously could not consider Chapter 7 because of the built-up equity in their homes.

The amended statute is identical to the prior statute with the exception that the amount of the exemption has changed. Accordingly, it is reasonable to assume that just as now, a husband and wife filing jointly can double their exemption for a total of $100,000.

History of the Prior $10,000 Exemption. The prior $10,000 exemption statute contained in C.P.L.R. section 5206 was enacted some 28 years ago in 1977 at a time when the typical Long Island home was worth about $40,000 to $50,000. Despite several real estate booms and the effects of years of inflation, the 1977 exemption was never increased.

Senator Vincent Leibell who sponsored the bill, stated in his memo in support of the amendment, that the $50,000 amount was a much more realistic figure and that the previous amount of $10,000 was so low that it was tantamount to having no exemption at all.

Apparently, the New York State legislature has for years regularly proposed legislation seeking to increase the homestead exemption. However, such legislation was routinely rejected or ignored in the Republican-run Senate, according to information in a New York Law Journal article. Since such legislation never made any progress over the course of a decade, the bankruptcy bar stopped paying attention many years ago.

Practical Tips. Consumer bankruptcy practitioners will have to immediately review all pending cases. The following are some practical tips to consider:

Immediately Re-Evaluate All Open Files. In all pending cases involving debtors with real estate where you have not yet filed the petition, you will need to re-analyze the effects of the new exemption to determine whether Chapter 7 will now be a feasible alternative to Chapter 13. In addition, you may have previously turned away some clients because the small $10,000 exemption was insufficient at the time to make a bankruptcy filing workable. You should quickly contact these clients and have them come in again.

Re-Examine All Chapter 13 Cases That Have Not Been Discharged. Even if you filed a Chapter 13 case several years ago, it may be possible to convert the case to one under Chapter 7, thereby enabling the debtor to stop having to make any further plan payments. However, you would need to be mindful of the good faith issues involved with Code section 707(b). In other words, if elimination of the monthly plan payment from the budget results in a significant increase in disposable income, then the United States Trustee can theoretically argue that the debtor should instead remain in Chapter 13. However, many debtors supplemented their income in Chapter 13 with either second jobs or contributions from family members in order to have sufficient funds to pay into the plan. These situations would probably call for conversion to Chapter 7, assuming that equity was within the new exemption amount.

Consider Amending the Schedule of Exemption in Certain Recently-Filed Cases. If you recently filed a Chapter 7 real estate case in which the trustee has taken the position that there may be non-exempt equity in a home, or if you filed a Chapter 13 case in which the amount of plan payments are based on the amount of equity in the home, consider amending the schedule of exemptions to provide for the new amount. The ability of debtors to do this will most certainly be tested with litigation. The issue is whether a debtor can amend the exemptions post-petition to take advantage of the new exemption. Theoretically, a debtor can amend the schedules at any time while the case is pending. However, trustees will certainly litigate this issue. The answer as to whether amending the exemption schedules would be successful is up in the air, but would probably be worth the effort considering the amounts involved.

Rush, Rush, Rush to File Those Petitions! The “Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005,” also known as S. 256, is the new federal law that will go into effect on October 17, 2005, making filing for bankruptcy relief much more difficult. The new law imposes a strict means test and has many other onorus and burdensome requirements. You will certainly want to file before the new law becomes effective. After that date, many potential debtors who could have taken advantage of the new homestead exemption by filing for Chapter 7 may instead be required to file Chapter 13 because of the means test.

About the Author.  Long Island Bankruptcy Attorney Craig D. Robins, Esq., is a regular columnist for the Suffolk Lawyer, the official publication of the Suffolk County Bar Association in New York. This article appeared in the September 2005 issue of the Suffolk Lawyer. Mr. Robins is a bankruptcy lawyer who has represented thousands of consumer and business clients during the past twenty years. He has offices in Medford, Commack, Woodbury and Valley Stream. (516) 496-0800. For information about filing bankruptcy on Long Island, please visit his Bankruptcy web site: http://www.BankruptcyCanHelp.com.

Written by Craig D. Robins, Esq.

There are many issues facing the plaintiff negligence attorney whose personal injury client files for bankruptcy. Here are some bankruptcy fundamentals that you should be aware of.

Bankruptcy Involves Different Statutes and Rules. Most personal injury attorneys practice relatively little in Federal Court, let alone Bankruptcy Court. Thus, when their P.I. client files for bankruptcy, a different world opens up with intimidating statutes and rules much different than those usually encountered in the typical Supreme Court action. Bankruptcy practice is governed by the United States Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules. The Bankruptcy Courts in New York employ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as opposed to the C.P.L.R. In addition, there are “local rules” for the two Bankruptcy Courts that comprise the Eastern District of New York, located in Central Islip and Brooklyn.

Personal Injury Suits and Causes of Action are Assets. A serious injury that gives a debtor the right to sue for personal injury is an asset of the bankruptcy estate. The debtor can exempt the first $7,500 in net proceeds, but anything over and above that belongs to the bankruptcy estate.

All Causes of Action Must be Scheduled. It is very important to make sure that the debtor scheduled the P.I. suit or cause of action in the bankruptcy petition. The debtor’s failure to schedule a potential cause of action may actually work as a meritorious defense to the entire P.I. case, which can result in having the P.I. case dismissed. Current New York case law states that if a P.I. plaintiff filed a chapter 7 petition but failed to list a potential cause of action for personal injuries, then the plaintiff lacks standing to bring the P.I. action.

What to Do If Your P.I. Client Failed to List the Cause of Action. If your P.I. client failed to list the cause of action, then you should immediately contact the attorney who prepared the bankruptcy petition to discuss why this happened, and to determine whether any amendments were ever filed, or whether the matter was addressed at the first meeting of creditors. Unfortunately, some attorneys who prepare bankruptcy petitions are not thorough enough to cross-examine their clients as to such intangible assets as causes of action. Nevertheless, a debtor has the duty to amend his or her petition upon learning of any defects in the petition.

What to Do If You’ve Already Initiated Your P.I. Case and Your Client Files for Bankruptcy or Wants to File for Bankruptcy. Hopefully, your client discussed his or her intentions to file bankruptcy with you prior to actually doing so. In any event, you should contact your client’s bankruptcy attorney to make sure that all information about the suit has been, or will be, properly scheduled in the petition. Again, the main concern focuses around the value of the P.I. case and whether the trustee will deem the case to be valuable enough to administer. You should expect to provide the trustee with copies of the pleadings and the bill of particulars. If the case may have significant value, the trustee will get in touch with you

Always Ask Your New P.I. Client if They Filed for Bankruptcy. Many P.I. clients neglect to tell their attorney that they filed for bankruptcy after their accident. If you learn that your client filed for bankruptcy, then you should look at a copy of the bankruptcy petition to make sure the client listed the cause of action as an asset. Also make sure the debtor claimed the exemption for personal injury. If the client already filed for bankruptcy and did list the potential suit, then you will need to determine what action the trustee took.

The Trustee May Abandon the P.I. Case or Cause of Action. Most trustees will consider the right to sue for a relatively small injury as being of “inconsequential value to the bankruptcy estate” and may have already decided to abandon the trustee’s interest in the cause of action. Generally, if a P.I. case will not result in any significant non-exempt recovery (usually a gross award or settlement of less than $15,000 before attorney’s fees and disbursements), then the trustee will not care about administering it.

If the case appears to be of inconsequential value, then consider contacting the trustee and requesting him to provide you with a letter indicating that he intends to abandon the trustee’s interest in the matter.

Another option is to wait until the case is closed, as any property which is listed on the debtor’s schedules that is not otherwise administered before the case is closed, is deemed abandoned to the debtor. Thus, as long as the Court closes the bankruptcy, you will not need to get involved in Bankruptcy Court and you can continue with the case as you would have.

If more than a few months have passed since the debtor attended the First Meeting of Creditors, consider having the bankruptcy attorney check the court’s docket to see if the Bankruptcy Court closed the case or if the trustee formally abandoned the asset. The fact that the debtor received a discharge does not necessarily mean that the trustee abandoned the asset or that the court closed the case. Also, closing the first meeting of creditors is not the same thing as closing the bankruptcy case. If the case is still open, contact your client’s bankruptcy attorney to see if the trustee expressed any interest in administering the P.I. cause of action.

The Trustee May Want to Administer the P.I. Claim as an Asset of the Estate. If the case may be worth more than $15,000, it is likely that the trustee will not abandon the cause of action and will want to administer the bankruptcy as an asset case.

Representing a Debtor with a P.I. Suit That Is Being Administered by a Trustee Requires Court Approval. The Bankruptcy Code requires that all attorneys who render services to a debtor must be approved by the court. A trustee may employ as special counsel under a contingency fee arrangement, any attorney who has represented the debtor in pre-petition litigation, when it is in the best interests of the bankruptcy estate and the attorney has no interest adverse to that of the debtor or the estate. Theoretically, the trustee can hire any attorney of the trustee’s choosing to represent the debtor in the P.I. suit, and can even take the case away from the existing P.I. attorney. In practice, however, this rarely occurs. The trustee will almost always permit the existing P.I. attorney to continue with the P.I. case because a relationship already exists between the debtor and counsel, and because the P.I. attorney may be in the best position to represent the debtor with a negligence matter. Nevertheless, it would behoove you to co-operate fully with the trustee.

Handling a Debtor’s P.I. Case Requires a Retention Application. It will be necessary for you to file an application with the court to be retained as special counsel to the trustee for the purposes of prosecuting the P.I. claim. Annexed to the application should be a copy of the written retainer agreement between you and your client. The legal fee must be reasonable and it is subject to court review at the conclusion of the case.

The application will also include an affidavit of disinterest in which you must state that you have no claim that is adverse to the interests of the debtor’s estate. This means that you cannot be a creditor for legal fees not related to the pending P.I. case.

The trustee will usually prepare these documents (as well as any other necessary documents in the course of the bankruptcy) and submit them to the court after you sign them.

Appearances in Bankruptcy Court by P.I. attorneys are rarely necessary. The application to approve your fee after the case is settled is usually brought by the trustee and should not require your appearance.

Who Is Your Client Now? Once the trustee seeks your formal retention on behalf of the bankruptcy estate, you client is technically the trustee, rather than the plaintiff. Sometimes this can lead to some unusual ethical issues.

Will the P.I. Case Be Transferred to the Bankruptcy Court? A personal injury case is considered a non-core proceeding which means that it involves issues not directly involving the bankruptcy code. You can therefore anticipate that the P.I. case will be litigated in Supreme Court.

Will it Be Necessary to Amend the Existing Caption? Some trustees may require you to amend the caption to reflect the fact that the trustee has become the party plaintiff. Most trustees will not require this.

Effect of the Automatic Stay on P.I. Litigation. The automatic bankruptcy stay imposed by Code sec. 362 does not operate to stay any actions brought by the debtor. The stay only acts to stay actions brought against the debtor including cross-claims, counter-claims and third-party claims.

Settlement. Some trustees will require you to review all settlement negotiations with the trustee Other trustees will be content on hearing from you when you’ve reached a tentative settlement. All settlements will require the trustee to bring a motion to obtain Bankruptcy Court approval. The insurance carrier will thereafter want releases from the trustee as well as the plaintiff. It is important to maintain communications with the trustee as to all major settlement negotiations. The settlement is generally made payable to the trustee.

Your Legal Fee. Once the matter is settled, you will be required to submit an application for a “final fee allowance” in order to be paid. This is something that the trustee should assist you with.

Concluding Advice. The biggest variable in handling a valuable personal injury case of a debtor in bankruptcy is the attitude and disposition of the trustee. Contact the trustee at your earliest opportunity to get an idea of the trustee’s disposition and preferences.

Long Island Bankruptcy Attorney Craig D. Robins, Esq., is a frequent columnist for the Nassau Lawyer, the official publication of the Nassau County Bar Association in New York. This article appeared in th April 2005 issue of the Nassau Lawyer. Mr. Robins is a bankruptcy lawyer who has represented thousands of consumer and business clients during the past twenty years. He has offices in Medford, Commack, Woodbury and Valley Stream. (516) 496-0800. For information about filing bankruptcy on Long Island, please visit his Bankruptcy web site: http://www.BankruptcyCanHelp.com