About Me
Craig D. Robins, Esq. New York Bankruptcy Attorney, Longisland bankruptcy attorney

“ Craig D. Robins, Esq., has been a practicing Long Island bankruptcy attorney for over twenty-four years ”

Craig D. Robins, Esq.

Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

The Issues to Consider in Determining If a Tax Refund is Protected in Bankruptcy

Posted on Monday (January 25, 2010) at 8:30 am to Bankruptcy Tips Consumers Should Know
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

 tax refunds and bankruptcy on longislandbankruptcyblog.com
 
Written by Craig D. Robins, Esq.
 
This post is part of a series of articles this week addressing every aspect you will need to know about bankruptcy and tax refunds. 
 
The Issues to Consider in Determining If a Tax Refund is Protected in Bankruptcy Are:
 
    1.    Are you filing for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13?
    2.    Are you filing on your own or with your spouse?
    3.    Did you file your bankruptcy before December 31, or will you be filing in the new year?
    4.    Did you already get your tax refund?
    5.    Do you own a home that you are also trying to protect in the bankruptcy?
    6.    Do you have other liquid assets such as cash and money in the bank?
 
 
Tax Refunds in Chapter 7 Cases
 
Most of this blog post addresses tax refunds that you may receive if you are filing for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.  I will address tax refunds in Chapter 13 cases later in the week.
 
Do You Have a House?
 
New York has an unusual exemption scheme as it applies to protecting homes and protecting liquid assets.  The way the law works, you can’t protect both.  You have to choose:  either protect the house with the New York homestead exemption  or protect your liquid assets with the various liquid assets exemptions.
 
If you have a lot of equity in your home, then you will certainly want to use the New York homestead exemption.   If you do, then you cannot use the liquid assets exemption, which means that you can’t protect the tax refund.
 
The New York Liquid Assets Exemption
 
In New York, each individual consumer who files for bankruptcy relief can protect certain assets:  Bankruptcy Exemptions in New York .  Each debtor can protect up to $2,500 of liquid assets.  This includes:
 
        —    Cash
        —    Money in the Bank
        —    Entitlement to Tax Refunds
        —    U.S. Savings Bonds
 
Thus, if you have a total of $500 in the bank and in cash at the time you file your bankruptcy petition, you can protect the first $2,000 of a tax refund.  That means that in close cases you have to look at the value of your liquid assets on the very day you file your petition. 
 
Sometimes a trustee will require that you provide copies of bank account statements that indicate what your balance was on the date your petition was filed.
 
The $2,500 liquid assets exemption is per person and can be doubled if you are filing with a spouse, for a total of $5,000.
 
There is no distinction between Federal refunds and state refunds.
 
What Happens to a Joint Tax Refund If You File Bankruptcy Without Your Spouse?
 
In the State of New York, each spouse is entitled to one-half of the tax refund for bankruptcy purposes.  Last year I wrote a detailed review of the law about this.  See Who Owns the Tax Refund in a Bankruptcy Case: Trustee or Spouse? Apportioning the Refund of a Non-filing Spouse .
 
Here’s how a refund is allocated between debtor and non-filing spouse:  Let’s suppose you file for bankruptcy and your spouse does not, and let’s assume that you can protect $2,000 of a tax refund because you have $500 in the bank (remember $2,500 is the total for liquid assets).  What happens if the joint tax refund is $7,000?
 
Since each spouse is entitled to one-half of the refund for bankruptcy purposes, then your share is one-half of 7,000, which is $3,500.  You can protect $2,000 of that, which means that you would have to turn over the unprotected part to the trustee, which is $1,500.
 
TIP:  This means that if you expect a large refund, you will want to have as little in your bank account as possible on the date of filing.
 
 
Quick Links to All Tax Week Blog Posts About Tax Refunds and Bankruptcy:
 
 
Informative Article About Eliminating Taxes in Bankruptcy:
 
 
Article About Tax Consequences and Bankruptcy:
 
 
 
Print This Post Print This Post
Be Sociable, Share!

Tax Refunds and Bankruptcy — Everything You Need to Know

Posted on Sunday (January 24, 2010) at 11:00 pm to Bankruptcy Tips Consumers Should Know
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

bankruptcy-and-tax-refunds-on-longislandbankruptcyblog.com 
Written by Craig D. Robins, Esq.
 
What Happens to Your Tax Refund If You File for Bankruptcy in New York?  Here’s the Complete Guide
 
Tax refunds can be several thousand dollars; so it’s worth learning how to protect and keep your refund if you file for bankruptcy.
 
Tax season starts the last month in January — which is when employers and financial institutions send out W-2 forms, 1099 forms, etc.  It’s also when consumer tax payers start thinking about and preparing for filing their tax returns.
 
This week — all week long — I will post a number of helpful and informative articles on everything the consumer needs to know about filing bankruptcy and protecting tax refunds.
 
If you file for personal bankruptcy in New York, a tax refund that you have not yet received may be totally exempt and protected, or, based on your particular situation, it may only be partially protected, or not protected at all.
 
To learn whether your refund is protected, carefully read my blog posts this week.  If you have questions or comments, please send them in.  Keep in mind that the best way to ascertain whether a tax refund is protected in bankruptcy or not, is to seek the advice of an experienced New York bankruptcy attorney.  
 
 
Quick Links to All Tax Week Blog Posts About Tax Refunds and Bankruptcy:
 
 
Informative Article About Eliminating Taxes in Bankruptcy:
 
 
Article About Tax Consequences and Bankruptcy:
 
 

 

Print This Post Print This Post
Be Sociable, Share!

IRS Federal Tax Liens in Bankruptcy

Posted on Tuesday (October 27, 2009) at 7:30 am to Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

Effect of Bankruptcy Filings on IRS Federal Tax LiensWritten by Craig D. Robins, Esq.
 
Last week I wrote about Eliminating Taxes in Bankruptcy .  Although you can often eliminate personal liability for old income tax debt, IRS tax liens can still remain attached to assets.
 
What is a Federal Tax Lien?
 
When there are substantial tax arrears, the IRS will prepare a document called a Federal Tax Lien and then file it with the county clerk’s office.  Doing so then results in the IRS obtaining a secured lien on any asset that the taxpayer may own in that county, whether it is real estate or personal property.
 
According to the Internal Revenue Service, three things must occur before a federal tax lien is issued: The IRS must assess the liability, send a Notice and Demand for Payment, and you must neglect to pay in full for 10 days after the notice was sent.
 
Can Federal Tax Liens Be Eliminated in a Personal Bankruptcy Filing?
 
Unfortunately, even though a debtor can bring a proceeding to discharge old tax income tax debt, this will not remove a federal tax lien.

Thus, you can prevent the IRS from going after you personally by filing for bankruptcy, but if they have a lien on your home, you will have to deal with that if you decide to sell or refinance the home.

Print This Post Print This Post
Be Sociable, Share!

Eliminating Taxes in Bankruptcy

Posted on Thursday (October 22, 2009) at 8:00 am to Benefits of Bankruptcy
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

Some income taxes can be eliminated and discharged in personal bankruptcy filingsWritten by Craig D. Robins, Esq.
 
Can You Discharge Taxes in Bankruptcy?
 
Some taxes can be discharged in a personal bankruptcy filing.  The most common type of tax that consumers owe is back income taxes.  In certain circumstances, they can be discharged.  Most other types of taxes cannot be eliminated in bankruptcy.
 
What Taxes Are Dischargeable In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

There is a multi-prong test for determining whether income taxes can be eliminated in a personal bankruptcy filing and this test is rather detailed and complicated.
 
First Prong:  More than three years must have elapsed from the date that the tax return was “last due”.  Assuming that no extension request was filed, the income tax is “last due” on April 15th of the following year.  It does not matter that you may have filed the tax return a month earlier; the three-year  period starts running from the date the return was due — in this case April 15.  Extension requests have to be incorporated into the “last due” calculation as well.
 
Second Prong:  The tax return must have been actually filed at least two years prior to the date the bankruptcy petition is filed.  Thus, even if more than three years elapsed from the date the return was “last due”, there must be at least two years that elapsed since the date the return was actually filed, before the bankruptcy petition can be filed.
 
Third Prong:  More than 240 days must have elapsed since the date that the IRS “assessed” the tax obligation.  Tax assessments are tricky and IRS records and transcripts should be reviewed  to determine tax assessment dates.
 
Other Issues to Consider:  The IRS has the right to object to efforts to discharge tax debts if they feel that the taxpayer filed fraudulent returns, willfully attempted to evade taxes, or engaged in a pattern of tax evasion.  Also note that even if you can eliminate federal tax obligations that you ow to the Internal Revenue Service, they may still have a lien on your assets if the IRS obtained a federal tax lien.  I will address this issue in a future post.
 
How Do You Eliminate Taxes in a Bankruptcy Proceeding?
 
It is generally necessary to obtain a determination from the bankruptcy court.  This, unfortunately, can be more involved than the bankruptcy itself, as it often entails actually suing the IRS in an “adversary proceeding”, which is a federal lawsuit brought within the bankruptcy case, and heard before the bankruptcy court judge.  However, since tax debt is often substantial, it is usually worth the investment.  For more information on adversary proceedings, see A Primer on Adversary Proceedings .
  
What about Discharging New York State Taxes?
 
The same bankruptcy rules that apply to the IRS also apply to state tax obligations.
 
What Taxes Cannot Be Eliminated in Bankruptcy Filings?
 
Most other types of taxes cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy proceeding.  These include withholding taxes, fiduciary taxes, excise taxes, and sales taxes.  Remember, income taxes, in general, that are less than three years old, cannot be eliminated in bankruptcy.
 
Discharging taxes in bankruptcy can be rather complicated.  Getting advice from an experienced bankruptcy attorney who has actually brought tax dischargeability proceedings is important if you have significant tax obligations.
Print This Post Print This Post
Be Sociable, Share!

Are Pensions Protected in New York Bankruptcy Cases?

Posted on Saturday (August 29, 2009) at 12:15 pm to Bankruptcy Exemptions
Bankruptcy Tips Consumers Should Know
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

Pension plans that are ERISA-qualified are protected in bankruptcy proceedingsWritten by Craig D. Robins, Esq.
 
Almost all pensions are protected in bankruptcy proceedings, whether the debtor files here in New York or in any other state
 
Here’s why:  In a 1992 United States Supreme Court case, the court ruled that any pension plan that is “ERISA qualified” is excluded from the bankruptcy estate. 
 
“ERISA” is the Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.  Under this act, pension plans, 401-K plans, and other “ERISA-qualified plans” are specifically protected from creditors because of a prohibition from being assigned or alienated. 
 
This means that the pension never even becomes part of the bankruptcy estate.  (The bankruptcy estate consists of  those assets owned by the debtor which the trustee can go after if the assets are not exempt).  When an asset like a pension plan is excluded from the bankruptcy estate, it remains the property of the debtor and the trustee cannot touch it.
 
Also, since pension plans are not part of the bankruptcy estate, you don’t even have to ascertain whether there is an exemption statute to protect it.  It is already protected.
 
So, simply put, an ERISA-qualified plan cannot be used to satisfy the claims of creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding and should therefore be totally protected.
 
How can you tell if a pension plan is ERISA-qualified?
 
Pension plans usually have a pamphlet of information about the plan which contains information about the plan’s tax status.  Most employers give a copy of the pamphlet at some point, but if misplaced, additional copies can usually be obtained easily.
 
The best assurance that a plan is ERISA-qualified is when the plan contains a copy of a favorable ruling letter from the IRS indicating that the IRS has determined that the pension plan is in compliance with the tax code and meets tax qualification requirements.  Incidentally, a plan could conceivably be considered tax-qualified even if it has not received a favorable ruling letter from the IRS, and even if it is not in compliance with the tax code, as long as the debtor is not materially responsible for its noncompliance. 
One important note:  Although the pension plan may be protected, recent contributions, if very large, may not be.
 
Of course, making sure a pension or retirement account is ERISA-qualified and protected is extremely important.  This is one of the many things an experienced bankruptcy attorney should do, and we do this regularly with our Long Island bankruptcy clients. 
Print This Post Print This Post
Be Sociable, Share!

Is Bankruptcy More Likely After Tax Season?

Posted on Saturday (July 18, 2009) at 6:30 am to Consumer Advice
Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

Is Bankruptcy More Likely After Tax Season?  There may be a seasonal phenomenon influenced by a rise in income-tax refundsWritten by Craig D. Robins, Esq.
 
There may be a seasonal phenomenon of increased bankruptcy filings influenced by a rise in income-tax refunds
 
It appears that many consumers rely heavily on using their tax refunds to catch up with overdue credit card bills and other financial responsibilities.  But the tax refund season only stretches from March through June.
 
So there isa  likely relationship with curing credit card defaults in the spring when consumers receive their tax refunds.
 
Several large banks who are facing difficulty in collecting overdue credit card accounts recently blamed the wane of tax refunds for their difficulties, but also pointed to the increase of unemployment.  Consequently, there should be a rise in consumer bankruptcy filings in the summer and fall by consumers who need to eliminate their credit card debts.
 
Consumers should be aware that in the state of New York, they can protect and exempt up to $2,500 per person of liquid assets in a bankruptcy proceeding.  This includes entitlement to tax refunds, money in the bank and cash in the pocket.  A husband and wife can thus protect a total of $5,000 of liquid assets in a bankruptcy case.
 
Thus, for those consumers who have not yet received their tax refunds, they should think twice about using a tax refund to catch up with credit card debt if bankruptcy is a distinct possibility.
Print This Post Print This Post
Be Sociable, Share!

Who Owns the Tax Refund in a Bankruptcy Case: Trustee or Spouse? Apportioning the Refund of a Non-filing Spouse

Posted on Wednesday (May 13, 2009) at 12:30 am to Bankruptcy Exemptions
Matrimonial Issues & Bankruptcy
Suffolk Lawyer
Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

Who Owns the Tax Refund in a Bankruptcy Case: Trustee or Spouse?  Apportioning the Refund of a Non-filing SpouseWritten by Craig D. Robins, Esq.
 
Like the famished creatures of the forest foraging for food after the winter thaw, around this time each year Chapter 7 trustees begin their annual hunt for tax refunds. 
 
Tax Refunds Are Not Always Exempt
 
Tax refunds are in the category of liquid assets which are only exempt up to $2,500 per debtor.  The amount of this exemption is relatively small and has not increased in over 20 years.  To make matters worse, a debtor cannot avail himself of the liquid assets exemption if he or she takes the homestead exemption to protect equity in a home.
.
Generally, a tax refund that is received post-petition is property of the estate if it is not exempt, and it is attributable to wages earned and withholding payments made during prepetition years.
 
Long Island Bankruptcy Filers Receive Large Refunds
 
Trustees get excited that Long Island bankruptcy filers often receive substantial tax refunds.  Since tax refunds combined with funds in the bank often exceed $2,500, and also, since many Long Island bankruptcy filers use the homestead exemption instead of the liquid assets exemption, we regularly see trustees salivating at the meeting of creditors over the prospect of administering a tax refund as an asset of the estate.
 
 When One Spouse Files, How Do You Allocate the Tax Refund?
 
Here is a frequent situation that I observe at the meeting of creditors.  Only one spouse has filed for bankruptcy relief and the trustee discovers that there is a sizable post-petition tax refund.  The issue then becomes what part of the refund belongs to the debtor (which is usually not protected) and what part belongs to the non-filing spouse (which is totally protected because it is not property of the bankruptcy estate).
 
There Are Two Logical Approaches to Apportion a Refund
 
I have seen different trustees taking different approaches, often based on what was most advantageous to the trustee at the time.  However, the case law is specific as to determining the apportionment.
.
One approach is to apportion the refund equally between the two spouses, 50/50, regardless of the source of income or tax withholding.  This is rather simple and straight-forward.
  
The other approach is to apportion the tax refund by calculating a proportional amount: the proportion of the withholdings that the debtor contributed.
 
The problem with either approach is that each can yield what appears to be an unfair result.  If you use the 50/50 approach, and one spouse contributed substantially more than the other, then you get a lopsided result.  On the other hand, if you use the proportional income rule approach, and the non-filing spouse contributed very little towards withholding taxes, then the trustee winds up getting most of the refund.
 
Since it is hardly worth it to litigate over relatively modest sums, debtors often quickly settle and give in to the trustee’s demands.  However, knowing the law will enable you to properly plan your filing and avoid getting into a dispute with the trustee.
 
New York Decision Favors the 50/50 Approach
 
The best case to look to is In re Marciano, 372 B.R. 211 (S.D.N.Y. 2007), which clearly states that New York uses the 50/50 approach, which is the minority view.  In reaching this determination, the court stated that it had no choice but to look to matrimonial law in dividing tax refunds between husband and wife, as state law is controlling.
 
The court distinguished New York from those states adopting the majority view (apportionment).  These other states have different bodies of law involving property rights; New York does not have any such laws.  In New York, matrimonial law (Domestic Relations Law section 236) governs disputes over dividing tax refunds between spouses.
 
The Marciano court concluded that considering the fairness of each rule to (1) the debtor, (2) the non-filing spouse, (3) the creditors, and (4) the estate, adopting a presumption of equal ownership of a joint tax refund as between a debtor and non-debtor spouse is the most equitable outcome. In a continuing marital relationship, it is a fair presumption that the proceeds of the tax return would be shared equally as a joint venture.
.
One caveat: the court noted that the 50/50 rule can be rebutted under certain circumstances if the spouses can demonstrate by their present conduct or history of financial management, that there is a basis for separate ownership.
 
About the Author.  Long Island Bankruptcy Attorney Craig D. Robins, Esq., is a regular columnist for the Suffolk Lawyer, the official publication of the Suffolk County Bar Association in New York. This article appeared in the May 2009 issue of the Suffolk Lawyer. Mr. Robins is a bankruptcy lawyer who has represented thousands of consumer and business clients during the past twenty years. He has offices in Medford, Commack, Woodbury and Valley Stream. (516) 496-0800. For information about filing bankruptcy on Long Island, please visit his Bankruptcy web site: http://www.BankruptcyCanHelp.com.
 
Print This Post Print This Post
Be Sociable, Share!

Filing for Bankruptcy Does Not Create Tax Consequences

Posted on Tuesday (May 8, 2007) at 12:17 pm to Consumer Advice
Suffolk Lawyer
Tax and Bankruptcy Issues

Tax Consequences of Filing for BankruptcyWritten by Craig D. Robins, Esq.

I was prompted to write this article by the unusually large number of calls that I received last month from old bankruptcy clients and their tax preparers. For some reason, many tax preparers, not knowing how to treat bankruptcy for tax purposes, mistakenly believe that a taxpayer’s bankruptcy must either be reported on a tax return, or there would be tax consequences involving the concept of “debt forgiveness.”

Understanding the concept of debt forgiveness is important as that may trigger tax consequences. However, bankruptcy does not.

There May Be Tax Consequences for Forgiveness of Debt. I frequently represent clients with negotiating settlements of credit card debt as an alternative to filing for bankruptcy. Let’s suppose that I negotiate a settlement on behalf of a client in which I reduce a $10,000 MasterCard bill to $5,000. The Internal Revenue Service views the $5,000 savings as “discharge of indebtedness” or “debt forgiveness” and consequently treats this savings as earned and taxable income to the client. The basic premise here is that any debt that is forgiven is counted as income and the IRS requires the taxpayer to pay taxes on the amount that is forgiven. This requirement is set forth in Internal Revenue Code section 108. Sometimes debt forgiveness income is referred to as “imputed income.”

The IRS Form 1099-C. The tax laws require creditors to issue their customers a form 1099-C when a debt is forgiven or settled for less than full value. The creditor must also file a copy of the form with the IRS.

There are Several Exceptions to Treating Debt Forgiveness as Income. IRC section 108 provides two pertinent exceptions. They include discharging the debt in bankruptcy and being financially insolvent just before the time of forgiveness. Insolvency simply means that the value of the taxpayer’s debts exceeded the value of the taxpayer’s assets immediately before the forgiveness of debt. The IRS has form 982, entitled “Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Debt,” that can be filed with a return to indicate the exception.

There are No Tax Consequences From Discharging Debts in Bankruptcy. When the forgiveness of debt occurs in a bankruptcy case, Internal Revenue Code section 108(a)(1)(A) specifically provides that it is not to be treated as income. Thus, discharge of a debt through a bankruptcy proceeding is excluded from gross income for tax purposes.

Creditors Sometimes Cause Problems by Issuing Form 1099-C. Even though the law is clear that discharged debts are not to be treated as taxable income, some creditors erroneously believe that they are required to send a bankruptcy debtor a form 1099-C when a debt is discharged in bankruptcy. Obviously this causes confusion to tax preparers who are often accustomed to including all income reflected in 1099 forms as income to the taxpayer.

What Should a Debtor do If Creditor Issues a 1099-C after Bankruptcy? If a credit card company issues a debtor an IRS form 1099-C after a debtor has received a bankruptcy discharge, the debtor has two options. The first would be to contact the creditor to advise them that the 1099-C was issued in error. However, since such creditors have no incentive to actively resolve this, the better option would be for the debtor to directly advise the IRS about the filing of the bankruptcy. The debtor can do this by writing a simple letter to the IRS supported by a photocopy of the bankruptcy discharge order and the schedule containing the specific debt. Alternatively, the debtor or his accountant can file an IRS form 982, which enables the debtor to point out to the IRS that the debt forgiveness (by virtue of the bankruptcy discharge) occurred in a bankruptcy proceeding and has no tax consequences. It is very easy now to go on line and obtain a PDF copy of IRS form 982 (or any other tax form).

Advise Your Clients That There Are No Adverse Tax Consequences. I will now be advising my debtor clients, in my closing letter to them, that discharging debts in bankruptcy is not a taxable event. So should you.

Remember: Tax Refunds Must be Scheduled. Around this time of year, many debtors will have filed their tax returns just a few weeks ago and will be expecting tax refunds. Remember that the right to receive a tax refund is an asset that must be scheduled as personal property. Since each debtor can only exempt a total of $2,500 of liquid assets, which most commonly includes cash, money in bank accounts and entitlement to tax refunds, it might be necessary to delay the filing until after the debtor receives the refund, if the expected refund is substantial.

About the Author.   Long Island Bankruptcy Attorney Craig D. Robins, Esq., is a regular columnist for the Suffolk Lawyer, the official publication of the Suffolk County Bar Association in New York. This article appear in the May 2007 of the Suffolk Lawyer. Mr. Robins is a bankruptcy lawyer who has represented thousands of consumer and business clients during the past twenty years. He has offices in Medford, Commack, Woodbury and Valley Stream. (516) 496-0800. For information about filing bankruptcy on Long Island, please visit his Bankruptcy web site: http://www.BankruptcyCanHelp.com.

Print This Post Print This Post
Be Sociable, Share!

About Us

Craig D. Robins, Esq. is a Long Island bankruptcy lawyer, who is focused primarily on helping individuals and families, find solutions to their debt problems. Read more »

Subscribe

Subsribe via RSS Feed Reader

Contact Us

Craig D. Robins, Esq.
35 Pinelawn Road, Suite 218E, Melville, NY 11747.

Tel : 516 - 496 - 0800

CraigR@Craigrobinslaw.com